Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Must be the Money!



Submitted by Fred on Mon, 10/25/2004 - 6:54am.
BY ANDREW WHEAT

Tremors from the criminal investigation into Texans for a Republican Majority (TRM) PAC are reaching some top corporate lobbyists—a crowd that is to Tom DeLay’s power what hair follicles were to Sampson’s fabled strength.

Tom “the Hammer” DeLay forged his extraordinary rise from bug exterminator to U.S. House Majority Leader by relentlessly shaking down special interests. With lobbyists in his advisory “kitchen cabinet,” DeLay organized the “K Street Project” in the 1990s to help Republicans grab more special-interest money in Washington. This scheme—named for the D.C. street that is home to many lobby shops—threatens corporations and trade groups with political reprisals if they hire Democrats as top lobbyists. DeLay and his cronies realized that the GOP gets more corporate money when a Republican heads the lobby. The K Street Project was as effective as it was crass. The House ethics committee, which few other lawmakers can arouse from its slumbers, admonished DeLay in 1998 for delaying an intellectual-property vote sought by the Electronic Industries Alliance because it was run by a Democrat.

The K Street Project hit Texas by 2002, when a D.C. lobby firm headed by former DeLay Chief of Staff Drew Maloney got a $360,000 state contract to promote Texas’ interests in Washington. Shortly after the disputed 2002 election, Governor Rick Perry, Lieutenant Governor-elect David Dewhurst and speaker-apparent Tom Craddick all appointed leading lobbyists to their transition teams or staffs. One of the first orders of business of Craddick transition-team lobbyists Bill Miller and Bill Messer was to solicit money from hundreds of other lobbyists for Craddick. Miller drafted a plan last year to make lobbyists “part of the Speaker’s Team” in exchange for material or financial support. After Miller’s firm mistakenly sent this proposal to the Dallas Morning News, Miller insisted that he never discussed it with his friend Craddick. In a rare split with the lobby, the speaker’s office denounced Miller’s account as “a lie.” Miller pitched Craddick on the idea in person, Craddick’s press secretary said, but failed to sell him on the idea.

Given the extent to which the corporate lobby has become an arm of powerful politicians in Washington and Austin, Texans for Public Justice recently conducted a dragnet of state and federal lobby filings. This search identified 11 Washington lobby firms and 11 Texas firms or solo lobbyists who worked for multiple TRMPAC donors in 2002. Together, these individuals and firms lobbied for 15 corporations that contributed $389,250 to TRMPAC—or 65 percent of TRM’s total corporate funding.

Craddick’s Kitchen Cabinet
More than half of the 17 Texas lobbyists who represented multiple TRMPAC donors in 2002 worked for three Austin firms: HillCo, Toomey & Associates, and Locke Liddell & Sapp. These firms left fingerprints all over Texas’ 2002 elections.

HillCo Partners
HillCo Partners’ lobbyists and clients have myriad ties to the TRMPAC scandal. The parent company of HillCo client Mariner Post Acute Network belongs to the indicted Alliance for Quality Nursing Home Care, Inc. (AQNHC). This nursing home trade group became TRMPAC’s top corporate donor when Craddick himself delivered the group’s $100,000 check to TRMPAC days before the 2002 election. HillCo also lobbied for Continental Airlines, which the grand jury subpoenaed to learn how it came to pledge $15,000 worth of airfare to TRM. Other 2002 HillCo clients include business affiliates of TRMPAC’s top non-corporate donors: homebuilder Bob Perry ($165,000 to TRM) and the PAC of Farmers Insurance Group ($150,000).

Ex-lawmaker Neal “Buddy” Jones founded HillCo Partners in 1998 with Bill Miller. Miller came from the MEM Hubble/Communications, a public relations firm, which once employed Governor Perry’s wife. Right after the disputed 2002 election, Craddick appointed Miller and Messer to his transition team, along with TRMPAC Treasurer Bill Ceverha. Messer accepted his Craddick appointment even though he was busy revamping a lobby shop called Toomey & Associates.

Toomey & Associates
Just after the 2002 election, Governor Perry appointed lobbyist Mike Toomey to be his new chief of staff. As Toomey —who lobbied for TRM donors AT&T and Philip Morris—prepared to hit the revolving door that November, he recruited Bill Messer and Toomey colleague Ellen Williams to reorganize his firm into the Texas Lobby Group. The new firm hired lobbyist Lara Laneri Keel away from the Texas Association of Business (TAB). That group faces a related grand jury probe into the $1.9 million in anonymous corporate money that it spent to support many of the same GOP House candidates that TRM backed.

When Toomey, Williams, and Messer rechristened Toomey & Associates as the Texas Lobby Group, an unnamed lobbyist told the Dallas Morning News that the new firm gave Toomey “a place to park his clients while he is on the governor’s payroll.” Last month Toomey resigned from the Governor’s Office amid rumors that his name could surface in a next wave of grand jury subpoenas and indictments. The grand jury already has subpoenaed Toomey colleague Ellen Williams and the PAC director of Texans for Lawsuit Reform, a Toomey client that backed most of TRM’s 2002 GOP House candidates.

Locke Liddell & Sapp
Lobbyists at Locke Liddell worked in 2002 for TRM-donors Burlington Northern, Gulf States Toyota and Houston beer distributor Silver Eagle. In 2002 Locke Liddell also employed attorney Andy Taylor, who arguably had more fingers in the 2002 election scandals than any other political operative. A one-time clerk to Texas Supreme Court Chief Justices Tom Phillips and John Hill, Taylor joined Hill at Locke Liddell before then-Attorney General John Cornyn appointed him assistant attorney general in 1999. Cornyn and Taylor then steered $800,000 in legal work to Taylor’s old firm to help vet the state’s initial efforts to redraw congressional districts after the 2000 Census.

Taylor became busier than ever after the disputed 2002 election. He advised TRM and TAB, which now were fighting civil and criminal allegations that the $2.5 million in corporate money they collectively spent to influence those elections violated Texas’ severe restrictions on corporate electioneering. (Taylor later stepped down as TRMPAC’s lawyer.) As DeLay’s redistricting plans got underway, new Attorney General Greg Abbott hired Taylor as one of his outside redistricting lawyers. Starting this gig at Locke Liddell, Taylor continued to represent the state on redistricting after launching his own firm in April 2003. Taylor’s dizzying roles in the scandals surrounding the 2002 elections prompted recurring ethical questions. In one posed during the thick of the 2003 redistricting fight, Democratic Senator Royce West asked, “Why is the AG allowing Tom DeLay’s attorney to draw the [redistricting] map for the state of Texas?”

DeLay’s Kitchen Cabinet
Many of the 11 D.C. lobby firms that represented multiple TRM donors in 2002 have close ties to DeLay or Joe Barton. Both Texas Congressmen are involved in TRM-related controversies. Internal e-mails from indicted TRM-donor Westar Energy suggest that four Republicans in Congress (Senator Richard Shelby and Congressmen DeLay, Barton, and Billy Tauzin) directed Westar to channel $56,500 to TRM and other GOP candidates and committees in exchange for support for Westar’s legislative agenda. All of the Westar Four except Senator Shelby also visited Austin three years later to huddle with top state leaders as they drafted new congressional districts, according to official calendars of Governor Perry, Lieutenant Governor Dewhurst, and Speaker Craddick.

Alexander Strategy Group
Former DeLay staffers Ed Buckham, Karl Gallant, and Tony Rudy all went on to form the Alexander Strategy Group, which lobbied in 2002 for TRM donors AT&T and Questerra Corp. Gallant once directed TRM’s federal cousin, Americans for a Republican Majority (ARM) PAC. DeLay disclosed to Congress that the Alexander Strategy Group paid his wife $40,000 a year, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported in 2002. A DeLay spokesperson told the Star-Telegram that Christine DeLay actually was paid to help run ARMPAC.

Federalist Group
Top lobbyists at the Federalist Group include former DeLay aides Drew Maloney and Chris Lynch, as well as Stewart Hall, an ex-legislative director for Westar Four Senator Richard Shelby. This firm’s 2002 client list included the state of Texas as well as TRM donors Reliant Energy and El Paso Corp. A new client for this firm is the Texas Energy Center, which recently won a $3.6 million state grant from Governor Perry to build a research facility at the University of Houston Sugar Land campus—in DeLay’s backyard.

Preston Gates Ellis & Rouvellas
Although Preston Gates just lobbied for one TRM donor, Burlington Northern, this lobby firm itself contributed $25,000 to TRM. One lobbyist who worked on the firm’s Burlington Northern account is former DeLay aide Michael Scanlon. Congress, the FBI, and a D.C. grand jury are investigating tens of millions of dollars that Scanlon and DeLay pal Jack Abramoff charged Indian tribes to promote casinos. In one remarkable deal, the duo first got paid to rally support behind Texas Attorney General John Cornyn’s February 2002 closing of a Tigua tribal casino in El Paso. Then Abramoff convinced tribal leaders (whom he privately derided as “stupid” and “moronic”) to pay him and Scanlon $4.2 million to try to reopen that same casino.

Barton’s Kitchen Cabinet
Former aides of House Energy and Commerce Chair Joe Barton lobby at three firms that represented multiple TRMPAC donors. Barton’s ex-legislative counsel, Stephen Sayle, is at Dutko Group, which lobbied in 2002 for TRM donors AT&T, PacifiCare, and Maxxam. Stephen Waguespack, Barton’s ex-legislative director, lobbies at Alpine Group, which represented TRM donors AT&T and El Paso Corp. Finally, ex-Barton aide Jeffrey MacKinnon is a partner at Ryan Phillips Utrecht & MacKinnon, which lobbied for TRM donors Reliant and Williams Companies.

Many lobby firms that represented multiple corporate TRM donors have close personal ties to DeLay, Barton, and Craddick, and to politicians involved in the 2002 Republican takeover of the House, as well as ties to the subsequent redrawing of Texas’ congressional districts. These firms’ lobbyists were well situated to help politicians and corporate donors coordinate political expenditures. How high up the political food chain prosecutors climb in the TRM and TAB probes presumably hinges on a key question: Is it by coincidence or coordination that these politicians, corporations, and consultants keep cropping up along TRM’s corporate money trail? Strong evidence of conspiratorial coordination might put powerful politicians on the prosecutorial hot seat.

Andrew Wheat is research director of Austin-based Texans for Public Justice.

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Kingsville Dome Project "in-situ leach ("ISL") technology"


Uranium Resources, Inc. was organized in 1977 with the primary objective to acquire, develop, and place into production, uranium deposits in the southwestern United States using in-situ leach ("ISL") technology. Uranium Resources, Inc. has constructed and operated ISL projects in Texas and Wyoming and participated in numerous joint venture projects over the past 25 years. New production commenced at the Vasquez ISL project in 2004 and the Kingsville Dome ISL project, which has a history of low cost production, will commence production in April 2006. Their combined nominal annual production capability is expected to range between 1.0 to 1.2 million lbs. U3O8. The Company has successfully produced and completely restored commercial ISL projects in Texas and a pilot plant project in North Platte Wyoming. Our strategic plan is to acquire the best-known uranium resource properties in Texas and New Mexico, the associated intellectual data available, obtain the necessary permits and licenses, and maintain technological staff to produce these properties commercially. Uranium Resources, Inc. properties can compete with international uranium production based on operating costs. Hydro Resources, Inc., the wholly owned subsidiary whose role is the operating company for acquisition, permitting (licensing) and developing of the New Mexico properties, has invested over $25 million in New Mexico since 1986 because the San Juan Basin is the most prolific uranium province in the United States with historical production of over 347 million lbs. U3O8.


South Texas Projects
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vasquez URI, Inc., "URI" the company's wholly owned subsidiary in Texas is currently licensed and permitted and operating. The Vasquez production facility was commissioned in October, 2004 and is producing uranium loaded resin for delivery and processing at the Kingsville Dome central plant. The Vasquez production is the first uranium produced in Texas since 1999.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kingsville Dome This project has been through two different production cycles (due to market conditions) since 1988. Initial production commenced in May 1988. From then until July 1999, we produced a total of 3.5 million pounds. The Kingsville Dome deposit is scheduled to resume mining in April 2006 as a result of the approval of our Production Area Authorization #3 which was received in February 2006.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rosita Based on the significant increase in the market price of uranium, we have reevaluated the potential for uranium production at the Rosita project and concluded that the properties contain sufficient uranium to resume production. In order to produce this property, we will need to spend about $3 million to fund the development and plant refurbishment necessary to bring this project back on-line.

Two Fer & Hugo Berlanga & URI Do Kingville citizens glow in the dark?

Tony Canales: “These Mexicans, we can buy them two for a nickel"
1/16/2005 10:35 PM

BNP, Hugo & Tony Canales bulldozed through Austin & pristine sand dunes!
Posted on August 3, 2004 at 03:39:06 AM by Jaime

Here is a little example of Tony Canales' manipulation of Hugo Berlanga in the seat before Hugo set Capelo up to be a Fall Guy. Hugo helped get the drilling rights. Capelo got the Medical legislation passed. Then everybody who was obligated (by ties to Dr. Hector) to vote for Barbara Canales. It did not happen. Just think if it did happen. Barbara & Hugo are good friends the families are close. I overheard a conversation between the two families while I stood in line behind them at the courthouse. ENLIGHTENING! One other little thing: The King Ranch & the National Park Service are working together. King Ranch is under the National Park Service which ties in Tony's "Primo" Gen.Cisneros (KFAT CEO). There is much more like the road from Kingsville to the Island. Like the connection to the Health System that KFAT uses to hide some of the money.

Texas Observer Political Intelligence: 3/15/2002 Barbara Canales-Black, who is running for the open Senate District 20 seat in South Texas, is co-owner of BNP Petroleum, which has recently begun drilling for natural gas on Padre Island National Seashore. Canales-Black’s firm quietly obtained the permit in February from the National Park Service, and the drilling has since become a hot issue in South Texas and in the election. She has three primary opponents, including McAllen State Representative Juan Hinojosa, and a runoff is possible. (At press-time, the primary is still five days away.) Canales-Black is the scion of a well-connected political family and has been using her oil wealth to outspend Hinojosa three to one in the race. Her father is Tony Canales, Tony Sanchez’s private attorney. (Canales, you may recall, was the one who hired the private dicks involved in the embarrassing investigation–some say smear campaign–against former Secretary of State Henry Cuellar.) To access the site, BNP had to bulldoze a road through pristine dunes. The site itself is covered by a 1.7 acre well-pad made of crushed rock. As obtrusive as this is on an almost completely undeveloped national seashore, this well may be just the beginning. The company’s permit applies to a 1300 square-kilometer drilling area on the island, and BNP also has plans to do slant drilling–for oil, not gas–from the shore out into the bay and gulf. According to Erin Rogers of the Sierra Club, the company has benefited from the Bush administration’s "streamlined" National Park drilling rules, which do not require a separate environmental impact statement for each new well in a permitted drilling area. To add insult to injury, as recently as eighteen months ago the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had planned to designate as much as 7,000 acres in the area as critical habitat for the piping plover, a threatened bird. This designation would have made much of BNP’s proposed drilling area off limits. But BNP came back with their own habitat study, which predictably recommended protecting a much smaller portion of the seashore. Backed by Nueces County and local Chambers of Commerce, the company successfully lobbied FWS to reduce the protected area to 2,000 acres.

Replies:

* “These Mexicans, we can buy them two for a nickel,” he said in Spanish!.

By Jaime August 3, 2004 at 04:17:08 AM

Re: Hasta La Vista Baby!!!!!!!!!!! 3/13/2005 1:17 AM

OK Mr Feet; Why did you fail to mention the first choice to relocate the Bombing Range was Kenedy County KFATSO's Ranch Land Where Karl Rove maintains a $250 K per year hunting lease. That there was over 2 million dollars wasted on an enviromental study and $500 K kickback to KFATSO for "damage to land from seismic testing". That the contractors used mostly out of state workers (Lousiana). That there was a future of abundant U 238. That it is connected with Tony Canales, Hugo Berlanga, National Park Service, Armstrongs Gen Cisneros, Hunts the King Ranch BNP & BNP Paribas. The South Texas Military Task Force was somehow preserved & muscled into existence. Check it out? Also all of the fishing cabins lost due to the TEX A G Vs KFATSO regarding the spoils. Big Boys fighting dirty for big stakes!

Bombing Range & now Messbarger tries to sell us on U-238 & a windfarm?

400K acres burning pockets: Bombing Range & now Messbarger tries to sell... 4/30/2005 5:44:15 AM
us on U-238 & a windfarm? ________________________________________ The community''s business with Dick Messbarger Let''s recognize our other energy sources March 28, 2005 Forget the old slogans touting ""A sport forever Texas"" and ""The Living Legend."" We''re going to start touting our area as the ""Diversified Energy Capital of Texas."" The Kleberg-Kenedy county region long has been a major producer of oil and gas, and about 20 years ago Uranium Resources Inc. (URI) with the Kingsville Dome Project initiated uranium mining. Advertisement This past year, American Shoreline announced the Penascale Wind Farm in Kenedy County, a potential $400-million project that could produce enough electricity to power the entire city of Brownsville. A second wind farm comparable in size to the Penascale effort has been discussed with Kenedy County Commissioners and also would be located along the coast in Kenedy County. So, if you look at oil and gas production, uranium mining and the prospect of wind generation, you see why I''m proposing a new slogan for the area. Some even have suggested that if you could tap into some discussions by area political entities, the hot air generated could produce another energy source - geo-thermal (that one will get me into trouble, but it was too rich to pass up). Uranium mining in Kleberg County has not followed a smooth road to production. Opposed by the Kleberg County Commissioners Court, URI eventually opened a mine that produced millions of pounds of yellow cake during its years of active operation. URI had a positive impact on the area''s economy but failed to complete restoration of its minefield, hampering its efforts to reopen the mine. When the price of uranium started falling in the 1980s, primarily because of Russia dumping an oversupply of enriched uranium on the world market, domestic mining came to a screeching halt. The price fell to as low as $7 a pound and it became impossible for unsubsidized uranium mining companies to stay competitive. Only foreign firms in places like Canada, Australia, China and Russia continued mining because their governments provided financial support - as our government has in steel, agriculture, railroads and shipping industries. Now the picture has changed. The price of uranium has been climbing to all-time highs (above $20 a pound) and the demand is skyrocketing. Because there was a surplus of uranium for years, the development of new fields was stymied and old mines were shut down - and most U.S. uranium mining companies went out of business. Today there is a major shortfall in uranium mining. This comes as 25 new nuclear plants are under construction, 37 plants are on line for construction during the next few years, and 74 plants are proposed (20 new plants in China alone). The atom generates 20 percent of U.S. electricity and powers 16 percent of the world''s electricity. World consumption is 180 million pounds a year, while production sits at around 100 million pounds. Gerald Grandey, CEO of Cameco, a Canadian uranium mining company, told a mining conference in Vancouver last week: ""The shortfall between demand and production has been covered by civilian and military inventories these inventories are finite and cannot continue to bridge the shortfall between consumption and primary mine production beyond a few more years."" Harry Anthony, a Kleberg County resident and expert in the uranium mining industry, has been traveling the globe evaluating potential mine fields in places such as Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Australia. He points out that the annual uranium requirement for the United States is around 55 million pounds for nuclear refueling, but the current domestic production stands at 2.3 million pounds. That means we are importing 95 percent of the fuel for domestic nuclear plants, a larger dependency on foreign uranium sources than oil. Anthony has scanned the old Humble/Exxon logs and feels there are potentially large uranium deposits in the area, particularly in Kleberg and Kenedy counties. Currently there doesn''t appear to be much of an appetite for expanded uranium mining with current landowners and governmental bodies. Experts in the nuclear industry have said for years that another nuclear plant likely won''t be approved for construction in the United States. Regardless, with oil at $50-plus a barrel, natural gas prices climbing and the downside to the environment with coal-fired plants, the prospects of generating energy from wind and the atom look more promising each day. And that, my friends, makes the Wild Horse Desert appear as the ""Diversified Energy Capital of Texas."" Dick Messbarger is executive director of the Greater Kingsville Economic Development Council.
dannoynted1Posts: 553

guess they cant buy the juge so they buy the lawmaker and his loser hub 4/30/2005 5:48:37 AM
Re(1): Juan Escobar, John Huberts puppet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Posted on April 30, 2005 at 06:59:53 AM by dannoynted1 About 10 people from the Coastal Bend went to Austin to show support for the would-be 423rd District Court. Supporters included Escobar''s former opponent John Hubert, Kleberg County Commissioner Romeo Lomas and Kleberg County Court at Law Judge Martin Chiuminatto. excuse me while i lmao for sure , loser john thomas hubert is the least credible compared with the devil cuz at least the devil admits he is a devil! last time i saw martin and john the judge was reprimanding hubert by stating ""not to insult the intelligence of this court"" i guess marty forgot.... hubert is the stupidest saint mary''s graduate in the history of law... and i got the transcript to prove it! john hubert what a disgrace to his ""family""
dannoynted1Posts: 553

Re: guess they cant buy the juge so they buy the lawmaker and his loser hub 4/30/2005 6:03:08 AM
oh and since his sissy cant get a court record sealed she is on the payroll of the stupid,rich& soon to be infamous she is a disgrace to her family as well.... i hear dallas need puppets like the huberts....
curmudgeonPosts: 3272

Why . . . 4/30/2005 6:29:50 AM
. . . pass up he opportunity for another Mexican judge?
dannoynted1Posts: 553

Re: Why . . . 4/30/2005 6:33:04 AM
a mexican slant? he is italian idiot! and tony can be bought for a nick he believes he is really white delusional of course!
dannoynted1Posts: 553

John Hubert, WAS PAID TO BY ? TO PUSH WHO''S AGENDA? 4/30/2005 3:07:28 PM
THAT HUBERT DONT DO NOTHIN UNLESS HE IS SUCKING OFF THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!! LIED ABOUT BEING IN IRAQ LIED ABOUT HIS INTEL QUALIFIED TO LIE WHEN THERE ARE SOLDIERS DYING IN IRAQ PUBLICALLY LIED THAT HE WAS A WAR HERO!!!!!!!!! THAT IS THE BIGGESSSTTTTTTTT CROCK OF CRAP BUT THE DEVIL I AM SURE IS PROUD!!!!!!! YOUR DAMN RIGHT ITS PERSONAL!!!!!!!!1
dannoynted1Posts: 553

escobar is a liar! 5/1/2005 6:00:02 AM
i know for a fact banales is in kleberg and kenedy counties more than 5 days a month! liar legislaters working for their opponents! aint that the shit? escobar and hubert sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g pedophiles said banales'' signs are too much to bear... those signs scare my prey hubert comes to save the day!!!
GuidoPosts: 153
Re: escobar is a liar! 5/1/2005 7:46:04 AM
Has anyone seen a sign in KLEBERG county? As I recall, Banales only had the signs placed in Nueces... If there is one, what is the address. Block number will do, if you don''t want to give the address...
dannoynted1Posts: 553

Re: Re: escobar is a liar! 5/1/2005 7:54:09 AM
i believe there was one on east warren..
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1460

Good intuition.............. 5/1/2005 8:39:36 AM
to make such an observation. I am sure Banales has many a pedophile enemy. And as you know they do have moral turpitude. I do not beleive this is the case even though to toy with the allegations is amusing. The underlying motives for this judicial creation has the stench of a Hubertian Cleberg Republican Party Agenda. With A Tony ""Two Fer"" Canales / Booth / Border Patrol Federal Element. Is that what you were not saying Guido?
propnutPosts: 197

Re: Juan Escobar, John Hubert, Lomas and the Running W Puppet Show. Told Ya 5/2/2005 7:37:12 AM
Jaime, what''s wrong with a new district court?
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1460

Juan Escobar, John Hubert, Lomas and the Running W Puppet Show. Told Ya 5/2/2005 8:06:24 AM
First of all they don''t need it. Next, Romeo Lomas & John Hubert is acting on behalf of the King Ranch for the King Ranch Agenda. The underlying motives for this judicial creation has the stench of a Hubertian Cleberg Republican Party Agenda. With A Tony ""Two Fer"" Canales / Booth / Border Patrol Federal Element. Manuel Banales does not beleive it is needed. He is not a malleable Judge is the reason they wish to circumvent. Tobin & Anne Armstrong have come out against the idea also. Probably because it will place Kenedy County at the hands of Cleberg County? Plan A which was to get Guy Williams into the DA''s Office and John Hubert into the Lege with the Good ole Boy Mayor Fugate and Lomas ''the drunk"" brown nosing and advocating King ranch Agenda. Plan A failed. But it did reveal a lot! Plan A did not work. on to Plan B Now Plan B A New District Court with a Puppet Judge and prosecutor for the Sarita Check point $$$$$$$$$$$$ and Border Patrol influence with the WIA funded Drug Interdiction / Seizure / Forfeiture assets. They don''t want the court for reasons of Comity. They want it so they can install their people to accomplish a certain agenda. They want a Puppet in the Wild Horse Desert! Next thing you know they will have Tony ""Two Fer a Nickel"" Canales Presiding! A Puppet Bench, a Puppet DA and they already have the KFATSO Mole. He is the CEO and Ed Byrne Operative while at TAMUK!
propnutPosts: 197

Re: Juan Escobar, John Hubert, Lomas and the Running W Puppet Show. Told Y 5/2/2005 9:14:18 AM
If they are using the excuse that the 105th has only a part time judge, will a full time judge solve the problem?
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1460

You need to go to the Docket Call.... 5/2/2005 10:41:47 AM
and witness true efficiency at work. Banales is a Work A Holic. In Cleberg the Community Supervision department is a cash cow. Not because of the fines and fees that the revolving door brings in but because of the Grants they get to operate the facilities. Then each ""special situation"" of a probationer merits another type of Grant. They alway fight dirty in Kingsville for the positions that control the Procurement & Acquisition and thus the plush grant money. The 105th bills Cleberg and oversees the Forfeitures and seizures also. There is a Plea Bargain System and Unadjudicated probation is a common sentence. So the Adjudication or Criminal trial is sort of postponed and postponed while the probationer is complying. If he messes up they can revoke and adjudicate. You cannot truyst Lomas or Hubey! Escobar got bullied into the lege!

Neighbors unhappy about mining operation

Neighbors unhappy about mining operation

March 1, 2006 09:57 PM CST






RICARDO - Some Kleberg County residents have been fighting a uranium mining company's plan to expand it's operation. But just last week, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality gave Uranium Resources, Incorporated approval to continue its mining operations in Ricardo.

Uranium Resources Incorporated ( profile ) has been mining in the small town of Ricardo, just south of Kingsville, for more than a decade. One of their richest sources of ore is an area known as Garcia Hill, the company calls it PA3.

"We've already mined about a quarter of a million pounds out of PA3 in the 1998-1999 time frame," said Rick Van Horn, URI Sr. Vice President of Operations.

URI uses different types of wells in its mining operations. One type monitors the ground water for the presence of uranium. Other wells extract the ore, but some residents like Teo Saenz said that process has contaminated their groundwater.

"They've yet to clean up anything, they've yet to show they can clean up meaningfully where it stays clean," Saenz said. Mine officials say they've done their part.

"The allegation that we have not reclaimed anything or not restoring or just sitting here doing nothing...we have pumped and cleaned and treated in these two areas about one and a quarter billion gallons of groundwater," said Van Horn.

For years residents in the area have been fighting the existence of the plant saying the work URI does poses a health risk to their families and future generations. In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency has told Teo Saenz and others that the ground water is unfit to drink.

"All those hazardous radioactive materials are in the water table they're in the water," Saenz said. Part of the debate is where that contamination came from. Saenz said his research shows him their water had acceptable amounts of uranium before the plant started mining, but now he said the levels are much higher.

"Now it's 20 times higher and they're saying they had nothing to do with it...if they didn't do it...who did?" asked Saenz. URI officials said there was already uranium contamination in the groundwater before they began their operations.

"If it wasn't drinking water to start with it's not going to be drinking water after," Van Horn said. "Uranium ore trends go right under Garcia Hill. We didn't place these here, these were here long before any of us came here."

Teo Saenz is the leader of a group called South Texas Opposes Pollution or 'STOP'. Saenz and the other STOP members, said they're disappointed with the state's decision to allow the company to continue it's operations, but they're not giving up.

Beto Garcia spends his time getting out and enjoying his ranch and spending time with his five year old grandson Adrian, since he retired from teaching. But he hasn't been able to enjoy his retirement the way he'd like, because of the sight of the uranium mining operations on his ranch property.

"It makes me stop and think am I going to have a special uniform to be out here with the goats," he said. Garcia leased his ranch to the URI saying he didn't realize what was involved or that his water would be affected, but he says once he discovered that his water was contaminated he immediately started sending the checks he was receiving from the lease back to the company.

URI officials said they're not to blame for the contaminated water, they said it was already like that before they started their operations. Still, Garcia is worried.

"There were some people down the road that supposedly...husband and wife that died of bone cancer. I'm not an expert if they got it from the water, but I know they were drinking the same water we were drinking."

6 News spoke with the Centers for Disease Control; they said they have no reports of any high incidence of cancer in the Ricardo area. CDC officials said they would investigate if asked to do so by the state, no such request has ever been made.

Still, Garcia worries about his family's health, especially that of his grandson Adrian.

"He's a lot younger than I am and is it going to affect his health? I don't know...that's what concerns me really." The company halted mining in the Garcia Hill area back in the 1990's because prices for uranium went down. The prices are now back up and URI wants to get back to mining on Garcia Hill. Company officials say residents have no cause for concern.

"There is not one instance where it can be shown that we have adversely affected any member of the public," said Rick Van Horn. In fact, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and the Department of State Health Services, which monitor the site, said the plant has never been cited for any public health or safety violations.

"We have not seen anything that has went to or I believe in the past that shows anything on escalated enforcement with URI," said state spokesperson Thomas Cardwell. If a state agency were to find URI was causing an immediate threat, they could shut down operations.

Garcia isn't satisfied; he's convinced that state has overlooked the safety issues. He said he'll do whatever it takes to protect his grandson, even if it means moving off the land his family has lived on for generations.

URI's operation is inspected at least once a year by the TCEQ and the State Health Department. Health officials said the plant has received some minor violations but they didn't involve anything that would have put the environment at risk.

Online Reporter: Jozannah Quintanilla





















All content © Copyright 2002 - 2006 WorldNow and KRIS. All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Power Struggle

In Kleberg County, Texas, a community has made several unsuccessful attempts at stopping a uranium mine operation. During a hearing in August, residents argued that Uranium Resources Inc. had failed to clean groundwater at their prior mine sites and their operations could pose a threat to the county's underground water supply. The residents lost, and mining operations will commence within the next year.

Kingsville Dome and Rosita (Texas)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kingsville Dome and Rosita (Texas)
License renewal for Kingsville Dome ISL mine
Hearing request granted on license renewal for waste disposal injection wells at Kingsvill Dome ISL facility
On July 14, 2004, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality granted the hearing requests by Eleuterio & Enedelia Saenz, Kleberg County and the STOP organization on the applications by URI, Inc., for renewal of permits for two Underground Injection Control wells, WDW-247 (this well has not been constructed) and WDW-248 (constructed), which authorize the continued disposal of industrial nonhazardous waste. The wells are located at the Kingsville Dome Uranium Mine in Kleberg County, approximately eight miles southeast of the City of Kingsville, five miles east of the City of Ricardo, east of Highway 77, and adjacent to Farm Road 1118.
(TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, marked agenda, July 14, 2004)

Extension of Kingsville Dome ISL mine (3rd production area)
Texas regulator approves extension of Kingsville Dome ISL uranium mine
State regulators have given a uranium company the go-ahead to expand its mine near the small South Texas town of Ricardo, despite the protests of residents who say the operation is fouling the groundwater. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ruled on Feb. 22, 2006, that Dallas-based Uranium Resources Inc. could begin mining near the rural Kleberg County community. Commissioners even overruled a Texas administrative law judge who had recommended that the company only be allowed to open the new mine after it cleaned up the groundwater in two older mining areas. (San Antonio Express News Feb. 23, 2006)
> Download Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Commissioners' Marked Agenda Feb. 22, 2006 (PDF)
Hearing request granted on application for third production area authorization for the Kingsville Dome Mine
On July 14, 2004, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality granted the hearing requests by URI, Kleberg County and the STOP organization on the application by URI, Inc., for a third production area authorization for the Kingsville Dome Mine Site under existing Permit No. UR02827-001. The proposed production area authorization number is UR02827-031. The site is located in Kleberg County, approximately eight miles southeast of the City of Kingsville, five miles east of the City of Ricardo, east of Highway 77, and adjacent to Farm Road 1118. The authorization would allow injection into specified zones for the purpose of uranium production. The production zone is the Goliad formation at a depth of 420 feet to 810 feet.
(TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, marked agenda, July 14, 2004)

URI plans to resume mining at Kingsville Dome
During 2004, URI plans to continue actively working towards the completion of the permitting for the Kingsville Dome property. It is anticipated that this will be complete by early 2005 allowing the commencement of production at Kingsville Dome later that year. (URI March 23, 2004)

Kingsville Dome and Rosita ISL facilites to be placed on standby
In view of the depressed uranium market, Uranium Resources, Inc. announced that it plans to shut-in and place on stand-by its Kingsville Dome and Rosita in-situ leaching facilites in South Texas no later than the end of the first quarter of 1999. The Company will maintain certain activities at the Kingsville Dome and Rosita sites including the continuation of its ongoing restoration efforts. (URI release Nov. 16, 1998)

Kingsville Dome ISL license violations
Uranium Spill - URI, Incorporated - Kingsville, Texas
"On January 24, 2000, the Licensee notified the Agency of a spill of 'bleed water' that occurred on October 26, 1999, when a feed line became disconnected from a main trunk line. A well field operator discovered a flange connection between a feed line and a main trunk line had separated resulting in a 2000 gallon (7.6 m3) spill. The area was on higher ground causing the water to flow down and collect in a low area inside the fenced property. The spill covered an area of approximately 4800 square feet (446 m2) and was contained onsite."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FORTH QUARTER 1999, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Spill of Radioactive Material - URI, Inc. - Kingsville, Texas
"On June 1, 1999, the Licensee notified the Agency of a spill of approximately 9000 gallons (34 m3) of restoration water containing 2.7 parts per million of uranium. The spill was due to a disconnect in the flow line from the well to the disposal pond. All spilled water was contained on-site."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER 1999, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI, Inc. - Kingsville, Texas
"On January 22, 1998, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 15,000 gallons" (57 m3) "of mine solution fluid containing 35 parts per million uranium that occurred on January 22, 1998. The spill occurred along an extraction line and was contained within the licensed area."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FIRST QUARTER 1998, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI - Kingsville, Texas
"On September 29, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 5000 gallons" (19 m3) "of pregnant mine solution containing 81 parts per million uranium that occurred on September 29, 1997. The spill occurred along an extraction line and was contained within the licensed area."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI - Kingsville, Texas
"On September 16, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 3000 gallons" (11 m3) "of barren mine solution containing 6.7 parts per million uranium that occurred on September 16, 1997. The spill occurred at the end of a lateral line and was contained within the licensed area."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]

Rosita ISL license violations
Uranium Spill - URI, Inc. - San Diego, Texas
"On December 17, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 7000 gallons" (26 m3) "of pregnant solution that occurred on December 17, 1997. The spill occurred on the extraction side of a lateral line. The spill was contained and 2500 gallons were recovered and deposited in a disposal pond."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI, Inc. - San Diego, Texas
"On December 4, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 7000 gallons" (26 m3) "of pregnant solution that occurred on December 4, 1997. The spill occurred on the extraction side of a lateral line. The spill was contained and 3500 gallons were recovered and deposited in a disposal pond."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI, Inc - San Diego, Texas
"On October 13, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 6600 gallons" (25 m3) "of pregnant solution that occurred on October 13, 1997. The spill occurred from the extraction side of a line that was attached to a main trunk line to the plant. The spill was caused by improper fusion of two joints. The spill was contained within a licensed area."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI - San Diego, Texas
"On September 30, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 5000 gallons" (19 m3) "of pregnated solution that occurred on September 30, 1997. The spill occurred at the injection side of a lateral line and covered approximately 400 square feet. The spill was contained and deposited in a disposal pond."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR FOURTH QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]
Uranium Spill - URI - San Diego, Texas
"On September 1, 1997, the Licensee notified the Agency of a uranium spill involving 30,000 gallons" (114 m3) "of barren injection water containing 1.5 parts per million uranium that occurred on September 1, 1997. The spill occurred at a booster pump on the main barren trunk line covering approximately 1200 square feet."
[SUMMARY OF INCIDENTS FOR THIRD QUARTER 1997, Texas Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

URI, Hugo Berlanga, TWO FER, and the beginning of the rift with MIKAL.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

College??? We don’t need no stinking College!
The Smaller Times did an article today about our friends down in Kingsville.Looks like they still can’t get the funding for the Rangel Pharmacy School! Our ever so powerful State Rep. Vilma Luna (DINO) who claims that the late State Rep. Irma Rangel was her role model was unavailable for comment. I guess that as one of the few members of the influential LBB (Legislative Budget Board) and close ally of the Republican Speaker she has better things to do than fight for funding for the Rangel School.What a SHAME that she has sold out to the republicans and yet has nothing to show for her community!Here is a link and clip from the story
Rep. Vilma Luna, D-Corpus Christi, is on the board but could not be reached for comment Wednesday."The community and the pharmacy have done their part," Garza said. "They've done everything they can do. Everything now rests in the hands of the Legislative Budget Board."
posted by elchisme @ 10:51 AM

9 Comments:
At 3:25 PM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
It is not Vilma Luna's fault.Try Escobar, Lucio, The new District Court in Cleberg Ploy John Hubert and Craddick.
At 3:33 PM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
Why dont "WE" need a college?This is why we have no law school below San Antonio. No professional school either.
At 3:57 PM, valleycityboy said...
BS its not vilmas fault!She is on the budget board! and has done nothing! As anyone who is in the loop in Austin and they will tell you that VILMA sold out Escobar and killed the new court because watts didnt want it! not to mention the water that HUGO berlanga is killing!get your facts straight Jaime!
At 7:49 PM, GulfCoastLeftie said...
Of course, Vilma has no comment now. She got great press during the session about what she was doing for the Pharmacy School. The cameras are off now, so she can stab South Texans in the back--AGAIN--and score points with her buddy, Craddick. Get out of the Lege and make a million a year as a lobbyist already, Vilma. Any more of your "help" may well destroy the area.
At 9:49 PM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
First of all the new district court is WATT WATTS wants (Hubert wants it too). Escobar should be ashamed of himself trading TAMUK pharmacy funds for the chance at a new district court that we dont even need. Good Vilma Luna blocked it. I am proud of her.WATTS will benefit from a Cleberg District Court without Banales.WATT did Vilma have to do with the Barter; TAMUK 13.3 mill for Craddicks Hosp District in exchange fopr the New District Court Legislation. That is WATT happened. I have all the proof you need. Ask Ricardo Barerra. We dont need a New Cleberg District Court.It is Tony "two fer" and the King Ranch who want a puppet they can pull the strings on in Kleberg. Anyway Kenedy County doesnt want anything to do with Cleberg.I got my facts straight. Kingsville and Cleberg County is my forte. That is where my fight originated. Vilma Luna, if you dislike her that is your right. I think she has toed the line and not to cross it while working for MIKAL.I will be emailing this to Izeman.WATTS has no control over Kleberg County that is why he would want a new District Courtt. Looks like the reverse of the reverses.Hugo Berlanga??? That is "TWO FER'S" boy!Remember he slipped Capelo in to write the Medical Legislation. He was facing Criminal charges. WATTT happened?
At 9:51 PM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
Remember the money was already there for the TAMUK pharmacy.Who stole it?Vilma already allotted for it one time.They like to duplicate sh/t over there in Cleberg.
At 1:52 AM, valleycityboy said...
First of all Jaime there is NO NEW DIST COURT IN KELBERG county! you dont even know the facts! The Legislation to Create did not Pass because Vilma killed it!Do your home work! Dont post if you dont know the FACTS! Everyone in town knows that Banales is owned by WATTS! (Update: Banales has made dome very favorable decisions for TWO FER) So thats why they dont want another court that he will not control!As far as Hugo, he was the Lobby for the uranium mine that is polluting the water in Kingsville! Just look him up in the Tx Lobby records! Again! do your homework! I live and work in Kingsville and know first hand!
At 4:01 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
Valley Boy: "Jaime there is NO NEW DIST COURT IN KELBERG county!"I never said there was a New District Court In Cleberg. How is Banales owned by WATTS? WATT cases? Banales does not have anybody running against him. Two fer and Watts are compadres, no? Proving now to be a relationship of convenience) Two fer is King Ranch King Ranch does not get any favor in Banales Court. I have been in the 105 Kleberg several times and never seen anybody get favor.Well maybe Mr 3 time Kilo.John Hubert licked his A$$. Anyway it is damn good that the New District Court was killed. They stole the TAMUK pharmacy Funding to influence it.I lived in Kingsville for many years. I left, due to Banales and his "Strong Arm". Vilma Luna, I know she works for WATTS but for some reason I cant buy the story that she does not represent her constituency. It is more Marisela pulling the strings for WATTS.Vilma Luna is a fall guy. HUGO is very close to Two Fer Canales.Hugo is the one who groomed Capelo for the JOB. I never said there was a new District Court in Cleberg but escobar and Hubert and Lucio sure did sell out TAMUK Pharmacy School for it. Ask Ricardo Barrera. He dont like Vilma Luna either. But he knows who traded his school's pharmacy College funding for influence in Austin. Hugo is not a good guy in my eyes. Have you read nothing I have wrote? You need to do your homework cuz Vilma Luna did not steal the funding for TAMUK PHarmacy School. It was Escobar, Lucio, and wannabe John Hubert. Why would Cleberg need another District Court? And Banales is not even on my buddy list. Since you live in Kingsville give me your take on Fil Esquivel, Sam Granato, Chiuminatto, Delma, Isassi, Laskowski and Hector Hinojosa. Oh yeah and not to forget Mary Cano. Kingsville citizens are glowing from the Water they drink and not a damn soul will do anything about it. Why? Do you drink the water? I have researched this stuff and wrote about it only to fall on deaf ears. Where have you been? If WATTS owns Banales then why would Watts want another District Court? Oh yeah you said he dont. I dont either but I am WATTS worst nightmare. Who wanted a new district court and why? I say it is the KING RANCH, Romeo Lomas and the Commisioners Court. Why does Kenedy want nothing to do with Cleberg? I dont see Mikal Wanting in on Kingsville as much as Two Fer. Are you saying Mikal is against the King Ranch and Jack Hunt and Lee Bass? Afterall, they are the ones who control the watering hole. Did you ever wonder why the Horlock ranch sold for only 4.8 million? Somebody wants a new district court so as to control the corridor and the AVARICE it carries. Apperances are decieving valley boy. Also if a new district court were to be created it would give another advantage to the valley politicos. Maybe you have something? Then again you must understand that seed propaganda. Just cuz WATTS gives someone money does not mean they are alligned. WATTS gives money so as to win over the elected. Everybody gives to Banales so as to not piss him off.remember OXY Chem? Two Fer lost in Banales Court.You need to see where I am coming from and probably I have left things out but I have been doing this for a while and finally somebody is joining the fight.I wrote this a while back. Maybe you can see a little more about WATT I am doing? He doesn''t deserve the name Jaime
At 4:58 AM, Jaime Kenedeño said...
Dear Valley Boy,I would like to thank you for the Berlanga URI info. I know Berlanga is all involved it this crap but I did not realize he was lobbying for URI. I will take your word for it. I know Hugo is a very close friend of Barbara Black and her father "Two Fer". I will link you to my articles. If Mikal Watts is against the New District Court I guess I have found something we allign on. If as you say Mikal has Banales under his thumb WATT has Banales done for MIKAL? I have my differences with Banales but I believe his dealing with pedophiles far outweighs his unprofessionalism and abuse of power in my wife's instance. He does have a day where he will reckon. John Hubert and Mary Cano and Marilyn Ruff must "step up to the plate" first. WATTS the deal with the KING RANCH's agenda? Does it allign with Mikal Watts? WATT about Durrill? Tell little Durril to "Just Get". If you want to discuss Vilma then we must mention three little letters TLR WATT did Vilma do for MIKAL? WATTS set her up to be the next CAPELO? .January 20, 2006Two Fer & Hugo Berlanga & URI Do Kingville citizens glow in the dark?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
See links to this post
Gene Seaman & Vilma Luna
The Caller Times 'up is down' edition, gives credit to Gene Seaman and Vilma Luna for trying to secure funding for the Rangel pharmacy school. What the Caller Times fails to mention is that Gene Seanman is a Republican idiot which makes ... posted by CouldBeTrue @ 8:35 AM
Nurses who needs nurses?
Another day another state school goes begging. See the Austin American Statesman story about Texas State in Round Rock waiting on construction money for their nursing school. And, we don't need no stinkin' pharmacists in south Texas, ... posted by CouldBeTrue @ 7:26 AM
"College??? We don’t need no stinking College!" 9...
"College??? We don’t need no stinking College!" 9 Comments - Hide Original Post Collapse comments The Smaller Times did an article today about our friends down in Kingsville.Looks like they still can’t get the funding for the Rangel ... posted by Jaime Kenedeño @ 12:19 AM
"College??? We don’t need no stinking College!" T...
"College??? We don’t need no stinking College!" Thursday, January 19, 2006 College??? We don’t need no stinking College! The Smaller Times did an article today about our friends down in Kingsville.Looks like they still can’t get the ... posted by Jaime Kenedeño @ 1:27 AM

TEXAS URANIUM MINE POISONS VAST AQUIFER

April 18, 2000 - TEXAS URANIUM MINE POISONS VAST AQUIFER

On Verge of Bankruptcy, Company Will Leave State with Huge Clean-Up


Austin...A uranium mining project has contaminated the Goliad aquifer, the source of drinking water for the City of Kingsville, near Texas's famous King Ranch, according to documents released today by Texas Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (Texas PEER). The mining company, Uranium Resources, Inc. (URI), has ceased operation citing lack of funds and likely will leave state taxpayers with a messy and costly clean-up job.

URI extracts uranium by pumping mining solutions into the groundwater to free radioactive elements which are then pumped to the surface. URI's mining techniques have left the Goliad aquifer contaminated with radioactive and other toxic substances, including radium and arsenic. Several drinking water wells in the area have already been forced to close.

The Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC), the state's pollution control agency, issued permits to URI conditioned on the company's promise to clean-up mining areas. But TNRCC never enforced the clean-up conditions and, in fact, aggravated problems by:

* approving expansion of URI's mining permits in 1997 despite lack of clean-up in previously mined areas;

* ignoring repeated spills of uranium-contaminated water (with three spills in one five month period in 1999); and

* blocking attempts by Kleberg County and local landowners to force a public hearing about the URI permit.

"This type of ‘rip & skip' corporate behavior is tolerated by Texas regulators who tout their inaction as ‘common sense' environmental protection," commented Texas PEER Coordinator Erin Rogers. "There is not a grain of common sense in letting a mining company poison the groundwater and leave the taxpayers with the clean-up tab."







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Home | About | National | PEER PRESSure | Feedback | Search |

TX PEER · P.O. Box 1522; Austin TX · 78767-1522
Tel: (512) 441-4941 · txpeer@PEER.org

conflict of interest kfatso and uri? sea fishing

Berlanga, Hugo (00019723)
(512)474-8187
28 Hewit Drive Corpus Christi, TX 78404
Start: 01/12/2005 Term Date: 12/31/2005

Charles Barrera
107 S. Sequin San Diego, TX 78384
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $50,000 - $99,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

ENTRUST
P. O. Box 440309 Houston, TX 77244
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $50,000 - $99,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005






GALCO
10201 Bay Area Blvd. Pasadena, TX 77507
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $100,000 - $149,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

Port of Corpus Christi Authority
P. O. Box 1541 Corpus Christi, TX 78403
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $50,000 - $99,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

Salt Water Fisheries Enhancement Association
711 N. Carancahua Suite 915 Corpus Christi, TX 78475
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $25,000 - $49.999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

Tejas Management Systems Inc.
5872 Everhart Road Corpus Christi, TX 78413
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $10,000 - $24,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

The John G. and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundaion
555 N. Carancahua Suite 1700 Tower II Corpus Christi, TX 78478
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $50,000 - $99,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

URI Inc.
650 South Edmonds Lane Suite 108 Lewisville, TX 75067
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $100,000 - $149,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

Berry, Jorey (00050706)
(512)858-2903
P.O. Box 833 Dripping Springs, TX 78620
Start: 01/14/2005 Term Date: 06/06/2005

March of Dimes
1275 Mamaroneck Avenue White Plains, NY 10605
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $25,000 - $49.999.99
Client Term Date: 06/06/2005

Berta, John (00053473)
(512)465-1000
PO Box 15587 Austin, TX 78761
Start: 01/01/2005 Term Date: 12/31/2005

Texas Hospital Association
PO Box 15587 Austin, TX 78761
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $25,000 - $49.999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005









Bertin, Suzanne L. (00050817)
(512)494-3005
1005 Congress Avenue Suite 1000 Austin, TX 78701
Start: 01/01/2005 Term Date: 12/31/2005

Reliant Energy Inc
1005 Congress Avenue Suite 1000 Austin, TX 78701
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $10,000 - $24,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

Beveridge, Douglas L. (00051557)
(832)681-5719
Three Riverway Suite 1600 Houston, TX 77056
Start: 01/31/2005 Term Date: 12/31/2005

King Ranch Inc.
Three Riverway Suite 1600 Houston, TX 77056
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $10,000 - $24,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

King Ranch Minerals Inc.
Three Riverway Suite 1600 Houston, TX 77056
Type of Compensation: Prospective
Amount: $10,000 - $24,999.99
Client Term Date: 12/31/2005

legal battles to cleanup URI.corporation MESS

Court Cases
Rulings Against the TNRCC




Heat Energy Adv. Tech. v. West Dallas Coalition (Cause No. 962 S. W. 2nd 288) In this case the court rejected TNRCC's effort to require hearing requestors to demonstrate more that that they have a justiciable interest to qualify as "affected persons."

Holton v. TNRCC, (Cause No. 97-06408) In this case the court rejected TNRCC's application of the test of the reasonableness of a hearing request. TNRCC decided that, while the requestor was an affected person and had a valid interest in the water quality issues invloved in the discharge permit, TNRCC conluded that her major or primary concern was flooding and, thus, her hearing request was not reasonable.

Sierra Club, Frontera Audubon Society, Mary Lou Campbell, and Walter Kittelberger v. TNRCC (Cause No. 96-14766) In this case, the court overturned the TNRCC's decision to deny a hearing to those protesting the expansion of a sewage treatment plant on Padre Island.

Sierra Club et.al. v. TNRCC (Cause No. 97-07501) In this case, the court ruled that in considering the Sierra Club's request for a hearing on a discharge permit, TNRCC "did not give the plaintiffs a fair opportunity to present evidence concerning their standing as affected persons."

Keith Weaver vs. TNRCC (Cause No. 98-04623) In this case, the court found that TNRCC erred in determining that Mr. Weaver's hearing request on an amendment to Eastman Chemical Company's permit did not present an adequate basis for a hearing.

Kleberg County and STOP v. TNRCC (Cause No. 98-05977)






Back to the
URI story
Back to
Toxic Texas





Toxic Tour Home | TX PEER | About
| National | PEER PRESSure | Feedback | Search |

TX PEER · P.O. Box 1522; Austin TX · 78767-1522
Tel: (512) 441-4941 · txpeer@PEER.org

Uranium Mining Pollution near the King Ranch




Uranium Mining Pollution near the King Ranch

This week's stop on the Texas Toxic Tour takes us to Kleberg County, in Southeast Texas, near the famous King Ranch. This is the story of Teo Saenz and his family and neighbors, who are struggling to protect their land and water from pollution from Uranium Resources Inc.'s underground mine, and from regulatory neglect from the state government. Listen and watch this story unfold through interviews with area residents and pictures of URI's mining operations.

Life Next to a Uranium Mine
Arriving in 1839, Teo's family was among the first settlers in the area. "My wife's grandfather came to this area, so we all have a very deep respect for the land, and the future for our kids, and the next generation," he says. Now Teo and his neighbors live next to an underground or "in-situ" uranium mine run by Uranium Resources Inc.
Teo's family and neighbors and the City of Kingsville use the Goliad aquifer for their drinking water. Because of concerns about contamination from radioactive and chemically toxic substances such as arsenic, molybdenum, and selenium caused by uranium mining operations, several of Teo's neighbors have had to shut down their water wells. "We're about three quarters of a mile from the [mining] production area, so we would be the first ones hit by any migration of uranium or radium or arsenic," explains Teo.
Audio & Video

Listen to the URI pollution story
Featured in our interview are: Mark Walsh & Teo Saenz.
Video:• Quicktime 656 Kb• Quicktime 1.3 MB
Need help with media tools?
End

For years Teo and his neighbors have tried to get Uranium Resources Inc. to clean up the heavy metals and radioactive materials created during the their mining operation as required by their Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) permit, to no avail. Now the company is on the verge of declaring bankruptcy, ceasing operations, and leaving Texas taxpayers with a massive pollution clean-up job.

What is In-Situ Uranium Mining?

In South Texas, uranium is found in the rock lining fresh water aquifers that provide water for drinking and irrigation. During in-situ uranium mining, hundreds of wells are drilled into the aquifer to inject a bicarbonate/oxygen solution to separate uranium from the ore. The mining solution frees the uranium and other metals such as arsenic, molybdenum, and selenium from the aquifer rock. In addition, Radium-226, a significantly more radioactive element than uranium, is also freed in this process.

The mining solution which now contains uranium and many undesired other byproducts such as arsenic is then pumped to the surface, where the uranium is chemically stripped out at an extraction facility. The contaminated water, minus the uranium, is then recombined with bicarbonate/oxygen and pumped back into the aquifer. When mining in an area is done, the company is required to clean the remaining hazardous and radioactive contaminants out of the aquifer. At many mine sites, state agencies have not ensured proper clean-up, and in some cases - any clean-up at all.

Radioactive Spills
Spills of highly radioactive water containing the leached-out uranium, other toxic materials and uranium-heavy process fluids are common in the in-situ uranium mining process. Hundreds, if not thousands of spills have occurred at the Texas mines, documented in part by thousands of pages of self-reporting sent to the TNRCC by the mining companies.(1) In the recent 5-month period from January to May 1999 at the URI mine, at least three spills totaling 15,000 gallons of uranium-contaminated water have occurred. (2)
Heath Risks of Uranium Mining

Uranium-238 poses little health hazard as long as it remains outside the body. If inhaled or ingested, however, its radioactivity poses increased risks of lung and bone cancer. Uranium is also chemically toxic at high concentrations and can cause damage to internal organs, notably the kidneys. Animal studies suggest that uranium may also affect reproduction, the development of the fetus, and can increase the risk of leukemia and other soft tissue cancers. (3)
Radon Releases from Uranium Mining in Texas


In 1982, the Texas Department of Health studied the radium and radon concentrations at four typical South Texas in-situ uranium mines. The study concluded that large amounts of radon, (Rn-222), is released by both conventional and in-situ mines. (4) Both Radium and Rn-222 are potent human carcinogens. (5) At the George West facilities in South Texas, between 1977 and 1986, studies estimate that approximately 40,000 curies of radon were released into the environment. (6) The EPA takes action to reduce radon levels in schools when radon levels measure 4 pico curies per liter, which is one trillionth of a curie.
Fighting for their Land

In 1997, Uranium Resources announced their intention to open a new production area, named Area 3. Kleberg County officials and a landowners group called South Texas Opposes Pollution (STOP), filed a request with the TNRCC to hold a contested case hearing. County officials and local citizens were opposed to the fact that the TNRCC was authorizing a new mining area before the previous mining areas had been restored. URI's TNRCC permits stated that URI had to restore at least one of its two mining areas before opening a third. The County knew that URI was in a tight financial condition and did not have adequate bonds for clean up and well plugging. The surrounding landowners believed that URI was simply trying to avoid the cost of clean up while it pocketed its profits from the mining.

TNRCC Opposes Citizens Rights

Even though TNRCC staff had sent out a letter to the nearby landowners notifying them that they had a legal right to a hearing on the new permit for Area 3, the TNRCC Commissioners, appointed by Governor George Bush, did not want the public slowing down the uranium mining. On January 21, 1998, the TNRCC Commissioners denied the County's request for a hearing, contradicting their own staff by claiming that, although it was obviously a directly affected party, the County had no legal right to a hearing. The TNRCC then issued an order allowing URI to begin drilling in production area 3 and URI began mining.

Winning the Battle -- Losing the Aquifer?

Over two years after the TNRCC allowed Area 3 mining to begin, Kleburg County and Teo Saenz and his neighbors won the legal battle for the right to a contested case hearing to decide whether the permit should have ever been approved. The Travis County District Court ruled on February 29, 2000 that the TNRCC must grant a hearing on URI's plan to open a new uranium mining area. This ruling marks the sixth time in the last several years that a court has had to step in to protect citizens rights to participate in permit decisions implemented by the Bush-appointed TNRCC Commissioners.

But the damage had already been done. After mining as much uranium as it could from Area 3, URI stopped mining months ago. In a March 31, 2000 press release, URI admits, "the company has exhausted all of its available sources of cash to support continuing operations and will be unable to continue in business beyond June 2000 unless it can secure a cash infusion."

Inheriting Pollution
Now, as the neighbors feared, Uranium Resources Inc. is on the verge bankruptcy. Teo Saenz is worried that the land and water near him will never be adequately cleaned up. "My inheritance was land, and we're giving them polluted water and soil," he says. "That's not a very good inheritance for our kids".

Join Texas PEER soon for another stop on the Texas Toxic Tour.
Sources:
TNRCC Reports
URI reports to TNRCC and TDH reveal
a 2/23/99 spill caused by a faulty check valve on well 5704B. Approximately 2,000 gallons of extraction water with a concentration of 9 PPM uranium spilled on the ground,
an 11/2/99 spill caused by a cracked joint in a line from the RIX in Production Area.

Approximately 1,000 gallons of bleed water with a concentration of 1.5 PPM uranium spilled onto the ground, and a 1/25/99 spill caused by a broken meter for well 6168A. Approximately 12,000 gallons of extraction water with a concentration of 1.5 PPM uranium spilled onto the ground.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, ATSDR Public Health Statement: Uranium, Atlanta: ATSDR, December 1990.
Marple, ML and TW Dziuk, "Radon Source Terms at In Situ Uranium Extraction Facilities in Texas" in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Uranium Seminar, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., New York, 1982.
Radium and radon are potent human carcinogens. Radium, via oral exposure, is known to cause lung, bone, brain, and nasal passage tumors. Radon, via inhalation exposure, causes lung cancer. Chronic exposure to radon in humans and animals via inhalation has resulted in respiratory effects (chronic lung disease, pneumonia, fibrosis of the lung), while animal studies have reported effects on the blood and a decrease in body weights. Limited evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that uranium or radon exposure may result in a decreased ratio of live male to female births in humans. (Sources: US Environmental Protection Agency, "Health Data from,":http://www.epa.gov/ttnuatw1/hlthef/radionuc.html Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Uranium (Draft). U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Altanta, GA. 1989, 1990.)
Specific calculations done by Resnikoff, based on Marple and Dziuk methods for measurement. "Radiation Exposures Due to Mining, Milling, and waste Disposal Operations in South Texas" Marilynn de la Merced, M.S., Ian Fairlie, Ph.D., and Marvin Resnikoff, Ph.D. November 199, p. 36-38.)