Sunday, July 09, 2006

Uranium Mining Pollution near the King Ranch




Uranium Mining Pollution near the King Ranch

This week's stop on the Texas Toxic Tour takes us to Kleberg County, in Southeast Texas, near the famous King Ranch. This is the story of Teo Saenz and his family and neighbors, who are struggling to protect their land and water from pollution from Uranium Resources Inc.'s underground mine, and from regulatory neglect from the state government. Listen and watch this story unfold through interviews with area residents and pictures of URI's mining operations.

Life Next to a Uranium Mine
Arriving in 1839, Teo's family was among the first settlers in the area. "My wife's grandfather came to this area, so we all have a very deep respect for the land, and the future for our kids, and the next generation," he says. Now Teo and his neighbors live next to an underground or "in-situ" uranium mine run by Uranium Resources Inc.
Teo's family and neighbors and the City of Kingsville use the Goliad aquifer for their drinking water. Because of concerns about contamination from radioactive and chemically toxic substances such as arsenic, molybdenum, and selenium caused by uranium mining operations, several of Teo's neighbors have had to shut down their water wells. "We're about three quarters of a mile from the [mining] production area, so we would be the first ones hit by any migration of uranium or radium or arsenic," explains Teo.
Audio & Video

Listen to the URI pollution story
Featured in our interview are: Mark Walsh & Teo Saenz.
Video:• Quicktime 656 Kb• Quicktime 1.3 MB
Need help with media tools?
End

For years Teo and his neighbors have tried to get Uranium Resources Inc. to clean up the heavy metals and radioactive materials created during the their mining operation as required by their Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC) permit, to no avail. Now the company is on the verge of declaring bankruptcy, ceasing operations, and leaving Texas taxpayers with a massive pollution clean-up job.

What is In-Situ Uranium Mining?

In South Texas, uranium is found in the rock lining fresh water aquifers that provide water for drinking and irrigation. During in-situ uranium mining, hundreds of wells are drilled into the aquifer to inject a bicarbonate/oxygen solution to separate uranium from the ore. The mining solution frees the uranium and other metals such as arsenic, molybdenum, and selenium from the aquifer rock. In addition, Radium-226, a significantly more radioactive element than uranium, is also freed in this process.

The mining solution which now contains uranium and many undesired other byproducts such as arsenic is then pumped to the surface, where the uranium is chemically stripped out at an extraction facility. The contaminated water, minus the uranium, is then recombined with bicarbonate/oxygen and pumped back into the aquifer. When mining in an area is done, the company is required to clean the remaining hazardous and radioactive contaminants out of the aquifer. At many mine sites, state agencies have not ensured proper clean-up, and in some cases - any clean-up at all.

Radioactive Spills
Spills of highly radioactive water containing the leached-out uranium, other toxic materials and uranium-heavy process fluids are common in the in-situ uranium mining process. Hundreds, if not thousands of spills have occurred at the Texas mines, documented in part by thousands of pages of self-reporting sent to the TNRCC by the mining companies.(1) In the recent 5-month period from January to May 1999 at the URI mine, at least three spills totaling 15,000 gallons of uranium-contaminated water have occurred. (2)
Heath Risks of Uranium Mining

Uranium-238 poses little health hazard as long as it remains outside the body. If inhaled or ingested, however, its radioactivity poses increased risks of lung and bone cancer. Uranium is also chemically toxic at high concentrations and can cause damage to internal organs, notably the kidneys. Animal studies suggest that uranium may also affect reproduction, the development of the fetus, and can increase the risk of leukemia and other soft tissue cancers. (3)
Radon Releases from Uranium Mining in Texas


In 1982, the Texas Department of Health studied the radium and radon concentrations at four typical South Texas in-situ uranium mines. The study concluded that large amounts of radon, (Rn-222), is released by both conventional and in-situ mines. (4) Both Radium and Rn-222 are potent human carcinogens. (5) At the George West facilities in South Texas, between 1977 and 1986, studies estimate that approximately 40,000 curies of radon were released into the environment. (6) The EPA takes action to reduce radon levels in schools when radon levels measure 4 pico curies per liter, which is one trillionth of a curie.
Fighting for their Land

In 1997, Uranium Resources announced their intention to open a new production area, named Area 3. Kleberg County officials and a landowners group called South Texas Opposes Pollution (STOP), filed a request with the TNRCC to hold a contested case hearing. County officials and local citizens were opposed to the fact that the TNRCC was authorizing a new mining area before the previous mining areas had been restored. URI's TNRCC permits stated that URI had to restore at least one of its two mining areas before opening a third. The County knew that URI was in a tight financial condition and did not have adequate bonds for clean up and well plugging. The surrounding landowners believed that URI was simply trying to avoid the cost of clean up while it pocketed its profits from the mining.

TNRCC Opposes Citizens Rights

Even though TNRCC staff had sent out a letter to the nearby landowners notifying them that they had a legal right to a hearing on the new permit for Area 3, the TNRCC Commissioners, appointed by Governor George Bush, did not want the public slowing down the uranium mining. On January 21, 1998, the TNRCC Commissioners denied the County's request for a hearing, contradicting their own staff by claiming that, although it was obviously a directly affected party, the County had no legal right to a hearing. The TNRCC then issued an order allowing URI to begin drilling in production area 3 and URI began mining.

Winning the Battle -- Losing the Aquifer?

Over two years after the TNRCC allowed Area 3 mining to begin, Kleburg County and Teo Saenz and his neighbors won the legal battle for the right to a contested case hearing to decide whether the permit should have ever been approved. The Travis County District Court ruled on February 29, 2000 that the TNRCC must grant a hearing on URI's plan to open a new uranium mining area. This ruling marks the sixth time in the last several years that a court has had to step in to protect citizens rights to participate in permit decisions implemented by the Bush-appointed TNRCC Commissioners.

But the damage had already been done. After mining as much uranium as it could from Area 3, URI stopped mining months ago. In a March 31, 2000 press release, URI admits, "the company has exhausted all of its available sources of cash to support continuing operations and will be unable to continue in business beyond June 2000 unless it can secure a cash infusion."

Inheriting Pollution
Now, as the neighbors feared, Uranium Resources Inc. is on the verge bankruptcy. Teo Saenz is worried that the land and water near him will never be adequately cleaned up. "My inheritance was land, and we're giving them polluted water and soil," he says. "That's not a very good inheritance for our kids".

Join Texas PEER soon for another stop on the Texas Toxic Tour.
Sources:
TNRCC Reports
URI reports to TNRCC and TDH reveal
a 2/23/99 spill caused by a faulty check valve on well 5704B. Approximately 2,000 gallons of extraction water with a concentration of 9 PPM uranium spilled on the ground,
an 11/2/99 spill caused by a cracked joint in a line from the RIX in Production Area.

Approximately 1,000 gallons of bleed water with a concentration of 1.5 PPM uranium spilled onto the ground, and a 1/25/99 spill caused by a broken meter for well 6168A. Approximately 12,000 gallons of extraction water with a concentration of 1.5 PPM uranium spilled onto the ground.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, ATSDR Public Health Statement: Uranium, Atlanta: ATSDR, December 1990.
Marple, ML and TW Dziuk, "Radon Source Terms at In Situ Uranium Extraction Facilities in Texas" in Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Uranium Seminar, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., New York, 1982.
Radium and radon are potent human carcinogens. Radium, via oral exposure, is known to cause lung, bone, brain, and nasal passage tumors. Radon, via inhalation exposure, causes lung cancer. Chronic exposure to radon in humans and animals via inhalation has resulted in respiratory effects (chronic lung disease, pneumonia, fibrosis of the lung), while animal studies have reported effects on the blood and a decrease in body weights. Limited evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that uranium or radon exposure may result in a decreased ratio of live male to female births in humans. (Sources: US Environmental Protection Agency, "Health Data from,":http://www.epa.gov/ttnuatw1/hlthef/radionuc.html Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Uranium (Draft). U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Altanta, GA. 1989, 1990.)
Specific calculations done by Resnikoff, based on Marple and Dziuk methods for measurement. "Radiation Exposures Due to Mining, Milling, and waste Disposal Operations in South Texas" Marilynn de la Merced, M.S., Ian Fairlie, Ph.D., and Marvin Resnikoff, Ph.D. November 199, p. 36-38.)

3 Comments:

At 7:12 PM, Blogger Jaime Kenedeño said...

A Federal Element and the funnelling of money in Kenedy County. What is going on?
by Jaime Kenedeno
Tue Mar 28, 2006 at 12:26:54 AM PDT
This case
is about lots of mula.

Article link updated I remember when they (KFATSO, Caller Times) were trying to say it was only worth 50 to 100 million? So much for credibility.

It is about a Federal Element and the funnelling of money.

Kenedy County is sparsely populated and our Elite visit with regularity.

Would it not be simple if not intuitive to associate this whole KFATSO thing (who by the way is commanded by a Pentagon Level Army General)......

Jaime Kenedeno's diary :: ::
from Tony Two Fer Canales who has been a Federal Prosecutor for a career and is "Primos" with KFATSO's CEO General Marc Anthony Cisneros' then we have the Armstrong Element that is Common in so many things we know as not kosher. Halliburton, well Ann Armstrong was very affiliated with Halliburton, Cheney "and the like". Now, personally I do not have a problem with this administration; but there is a point where I draw the line. I understand that we might be in danger as all who have stood up in this fight.

This fight will not be won in the Court Room. This fight is not over. It is my turn once again to rebuke the YANQUI's.

Get out of here!


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/28/32654/0430

 
At 7:14 PM, Blogger Jaime Kenedeño said...

Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 813

Kingsville: Where R The Leaders Now That Cleberg Citizens Glow?
8/2/2005 10:06 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Residents want uranium mines stopped
URI responsible for problems in Kleberg, they say

By LYNN BREZOSKY Associated Press
August 1, 2005


RICARDO - The extended Garcia family has lived for five generations in a cluster of frame and trailer homes known, with some irony, as Garcia Hill because its compound sits maybe a foot higher than the surrounding scrub.

The Garcias have another local distinction: Their water is contaminated with uranium at levels so high the U.S. Environmental Protection Administration has told them to stop drinking it and see their doctors because of a high risk of cancer.


Advertisement



The government and the company that has been mining uranium in the area for the past 20 years told the Garcias the contamination is natural seepage from the vein of the radioactive material that runs near their well, the very uranium that attracted Lewisville-based Uranium Resources Inc. to Kleberg County in the first place.

The Garcias and other Kleberg County residents don't accept that explanation.

"That's weird that it's the only place and nobody else has it," Humberto Garcia said. "It just kind of raises questions. A quarter-mile away we have relatives, and their well is OK."

The Garcias and other local residents see the family's plight as an emblem of the problems they say URI has dumped on them for decades.

URI well casings stick out of the ground on Garcia Hill. In the 1980s and early 1990s, URI pumps sucked uraniumfilled water from deep underground for processing.

The activity ended when prices plummeted from more than $30 a pound to around $7. Claiming financial problems, the company left without cleaning up the area or restoring the water below.

"The promise was they would take all the uranium and leave the water clean," said Teo Saenz, president of South Texas Opposes Pollution. "They didn't."

STOP members, who number about a dozen, say an engineer mapped the underground for them in the mid-1990s and accurately predicted that contamination from the mine field would migrate first to the Garcia wells. They now fear poisoned water will seep toward the water supply of nearby Kingsville, population 26,000.

The county reached a settlement in December with URI to clean the water. Under the agreement, the company must clean up its first old mine before starting mining on the third, the second mine before completing the third, then the third mine before starting on the fourth, County Judge Pete De La Garza said. The company also must pay the county $20,000 for an expert to monitor their cleanup.

At a public hearing today, Garcia and other local residents will argue that because the company failed to clean up its former operations, it shouldn't be allowed to mine new areas. The administrative judge will make a recommendation to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

STOP members hold little hope that they'll stop what will be URI's third and fourth mines. They said Kleberg County officials let them down by signing the settlement agreement.

"The settlement basically says they will make a 'good faith effort' to clean up the water," Walsh said. "It was a very big blow to us."

De La Garza said the agreement was the county's best route toward getting at least $5 million worth of cleanup done.

"We had two choices, the way I see it," he said. "The first choice was just to not allow them to mine, let them go away and leave our water dirty. The second I thought was more prudent - to get our water cleaned up. We're talking about millions of dollars."

Mark Pelizza, a URI vice president, said URI has operated prudently and that the residents can't see what cleanup they already have done. He said their operations have nothing to do with the Garcia Hill poisoning.

"I think the evidence is the uranium deposit underlies their houses, and it is established that it is natural," Pelizza said.

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:pCN1kXM-ZlQJ:ericvonwade.com/community/display.asp%3Fpost_id%3D35942%26board%3D1%26board_name%3DGeneral+kenedeno+uranium&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3

 
At 7:14 PM, Blogger Jaime Kenedeño said...

Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 813

Kingsville: Where R The Leaders Now That Cleberg Citizens Glow?
8/2/2005 10:06 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Residents want uranium mines stopped
URI responsible for problems in Kleberg, they say

By LYNN BREZOSKY Associated Press
August 1, 2005


RICARDO - The extended Garcia family has lived for five generations in a cluster of frame and trailer homes known, with some irony, as Garcia Hill because its compound sits maybe a foot higher than the surrounding scrub.

The Garcias have another local distinction: Their water is contaminated with uranium at levels so high the U.S. Environmental Protection Administration has told them to stop drinking it and see their doctors because of a high risk of cancer.


Advertisement



The government and the company that has been mining uranium in the area for the past 20 years told the Garcias the contamination is natural seepage from the vein of the radioactive material that runs near their well, the very uranium that attracted Lewisville-based Uranium Resources Inc. to Kleberg County in the first place.

The Garcias and other Kleberg County residents don't accept that explanation.

"That's weird that it's the only place and nobody else has it," Humberto Garcia said. "It just kind of raises questions. A quarter-mile away we have relatives, and their well is OK."

The Garcias and other local residents see the family's plight as an emblem of the problems they say URI has dumped on them for decades.

URI well casings stick out of the ground on Garcia Hill. In the 1980s and early 1990s, URI pumps sucked uraniumfilled water from deep underground for processing.

The activity ended when prices plummeted from more than $30 a pound to around $7. Claiming financial problems, the company left without cleaning up the area or restoring the water below.

"The promise was they would take all the uranium and leave the water clean," said Teo Saenz, president of South Texas Opposes Pollution. "They didn't."

STOP members, who number about a dozen, say an engineer mapped the underground for them in the mid-1990s and accurately predicted that contamination from the mine field would migrate first to the Garcia wells. They now fear poisoned water will seep toward the water supply of nearby Kingsville, population 26,000.

The county reached a settlement in December with URI to clean the water. Under the agreement, the company must clean up its first old mine before starting mining on the third, the second mine before completing the third, then the third mine before starting on the fourth, County Judge Pete De La Garza said. The company also must pay the county $20,000 for an expert to monitor their cleanup.

At a public hearing today, Garcia and other local residents will argue that because the company failed to clean up its former operations, it shouldn't be allowed to mine new areas. The administrative judge will make a recommendation to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

STOP members hold little hope that they'll stop what will be URI's third and fourth mines. They said Kleberg County officials let them down by signing the settlement agreement.

"The settlement basically says they will make a 'good faith effort' to clean up the water," Walsh said. "It was a very big blow to us."

De La Garza said the agreement was the county's best route toward getting at least $5 million worth of cleanup done.

"We had two choices, the way I see it," he said. "The first choice was just to not allow them to mine, let them go away and leave our water dirty. The second I thought was more prudent - to get our water cleaned up. We're talking about millions of dollars."

Mark Pelizza, a URI vice president, said URI has operated prudently and that the residents can't see what cleanup they already have done. He said their operations have nothing to do with the Garcia Hill poisoning.

"I think the evidence is the uranium deposit underlies their houses, and it is established that it is natural," Pelizza said.

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:pCN1kXM-ZlQJ:ericvonwade.com/community/display.asp%3Fpost_id%3D35942%26board%3D1%26board_name%3DGeneral+kenedeno+uranium&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3

 

Post a Comment

<< Home